Skip to content
03 · The plumbing every AI project turns out to need

Data & integration

Every AI engagement that stalls, stalls here. The data lives in four systems, two of them disagree, and the definition of 'active customer' depends on who you ask. We fix that layer first.

One definition of each metric, agreed and enforced in codePipelines with tests, lineage, and alertingSystems that sync without a nightly CSVA warehouse your analysts can actually query
An engineer reviewing data pipeline flow diagrams on two large monitors

What you get

Pipelines, warehouses, and system integrations that make your data usable — because no model, agent, or dashboard is better than what feeds it.

01Source-of-truth mapping

Which system owns which field, where the duplicates come from, and what breaks when they disagree. Documented, not tribal.

02Ingestion with contracts

Typed schemas, validation at the boundary, and quarantine for bad records — so one malformed vendor feed doesn't poison a quarter of reporting.

03Transformations under version control

dbt models, tested and reviewed like application code. Metric changes come with a PR and a diff, not a Slack message.

04Integration without the brittleness

Idempotent syncs, replayable events, and dead-letter handling. Integrations fail; the question is whether they fail loudly and recover cleanly.

05Retrieval-ready data

When the AI work starts, the corpus is already chunked, embedded, permissioned, and refreshing on a schedule.

Engagements

Shapes this usually takes

Most engagements take one of these three shapes. Which one fits depends on how well-defined the problem already is — tell us the situation and we'll say which, and what it would take.

1–2 weeks

Data audit

A written assessment of your sources, quality, and what it would take to make them AI-ready.

Contact us
6–10 weeks

Pipeline build

Ingestion, warehouse, transformations, and monitoring for a defined set of sources.

Contact us
4–8 weeks

Integration project

Two or more systems synced properly, with reconciliation and exception handling.

Contact us
Tools & stack

What we reach for

Boring where boring works, current where it matters. We pick for what your team can maintain after we leave — not for what looks good in a case study.

An aisle of neatly cabled server racks in a data centre
Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, ClickHouse
dbt, Dagster, Airflow
Fivetran, Airbyte, custom connectors
Kafka, SQS, EventBridge
Great Expectations, dbt tests
EDI, SFTP, REST, GraphQL, SOAP (yes, still)

Common questions

Do we need a warehouse before we can do AI?

Not always. Plenty of useful automation runs directly off operational systems. But if three teams report different revenue numbers, that will surface in your AI outputs too — and it'll be blamed on the AI.

Can you work with our existing data team?

Gladly. We often come in to build the layer they don't have bandwidth for, then hand it over with the conventions they already use.

What about legacy systems with no API?

We've screen-scraped, parsed fixed-width files, and driven a mainframe terminal session. It isn't elegant, but it's often the fastest honest path.

Talk it through

Is data & integration the right move for you?

Send us the situation. We’ll come back with a read on whether this is the right service, a rough range, and what we’d want to learn first.

We use your details to reply to this request only. No sequences, no list.

Taking two new engagements this quarter.