Skip to content
04 · Decisions made on purpose, and written down

Software architecture

Architecture isn't a diagram you draw once. It's the set of decisions that determine how expensive your next two years are. We make those decisions explicitly, document why, and stay to execute them.

Service boundaries drawn from real traffic, not org chartsA written record of every significant decision and its tradeoffsA migration sequence that ships continuouslyCost and latency budgets that hold under load
Two engineers discussing a hand-drawn system architecture diagram on a glass whiteboard

What you get

Boundaries, data models, and interfaces designed for the next 10x — plus the migration path to get there without a code freeze.

01An honest assessment first

Where the system is actually fragile, ranked by blast radius. Sometimes the answer is that your monolith is fine and the real problem is the deploy pipeline.

02Architecture decision records

Every meaningful call captured with context, options considered, and consequences. Your next engineer inherits reasoning, not just code.

03Boundaries from traffic

We instrument first and split second. Service edges that follow real call patterns hold up; edges that follow the org chart move with the org chart.

04A migration that never freezes

Strangler patterns, feature flags, dual writes, and backfills sequenced so you keep shipping features the whole time.

05Load and cost modeling

What breaks at 10x, what it costs at 10x, and which of those two you'll hit first.

Engagements

Shapes this usually takes

Most engagements take one of these three shapes. Which one fits depends on how well-defined the problem already is — tell us the situation and we'll say which, and what it would take.

2 weeks

Architecture review

A written assessment with ranked risks, quick wins, and a recommended sequence.

Contact us
4–6 weeks

Design & migration plan

Target architecture, ADRs, and a phased plan your team can execute — with or without us.

Contact us
3–6 months

Embedded execution

We work alongside your engineers to land the migration, pairing and reviewing as we go.

Contact us
Tools & stack

What we reach for

Boring where boring works, current where it matters. We pick for what your team can maintain after we leave — not for what looks good in a case study.

A hand sketching a system architecture diagram of boxes and arrows on grid paper
TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, .NET
Postgres, Redis, Kafka
Kubernetes, ECS, Lambda
Terraform, Pulumi
OpenTelemetry, Grafana, Datadog
Event sourcing, CQRS (when warranted)

Common questions

Should we move to microservices?

Probably not as many as you think. Most teams under 40 engineers are better served by a well-modularized monolith and one or two extracted services where the scaling or ownership boundary is real.

Will you just hand us a document and leave?

Only if that's what you're buying. We prefer to stay through the first phase of execution, because plans that no one implements tend to be wrong in ways you only find out by building.

We're mid-rewrite and it's going badly. Can you help?

Often, yes. The usual fix is to stop the big-bang rewrite, pick the highest-value slice, and ship it behind a flag. We've done this recovery a number of times.

Talk it through

Is software architecture the right move for you?

Send us the situation. We’ll come back with a read on whether this is the right service, a rough range, and what we’d want to learn first.

We use your details to reply to this request only. No sequences, no list.

Taking two new engagements this quarter.